By Dr. Abdullah bin Bayyah | Translated by Suhaib Webb
Taken from sunat al-fatwa wa fiqh al-Aqaliyat of Dr. Bin Bayyah
Part one can be found here
One of the important legal axioms related to the axiom of ‘ease’ is:
“If there are [scholarly] differences surrounding issues of contention, or issues involving independent judgement [ijtihad]; in the absence of a scholarly rebuke, such differences are excused.”
Ibn al-Qayyim said, “If there is no sunna, or unanimity on an issue, and independent judgement is possible, then one should not be reprimanded for acting on such an issue whether layman or scholar.” ‘ilam al-Muwaq’in ‘an rabi al-‘Alamin 3/365
al-‘Iz bin ‘Abdul al-Salam said, “If someone comes with something whose forbiddance is disputed, if he believes it to be permissible [and he qualifies for ijtihad or his a muqalid of one qualified for it], then he should not be reprimanded for acting on it unless his case is weak.”
Imam al-Harmain wrote, “Furthermore, it is not allowed for a mujtahid to rebuke [by force] another mujtahid since every mujtahid is correct, regarding secondary issues, according to us [the Shaf’i school].”
The Scholars and Differences
Hisham bin ‘Ubaydullah said, “One who is not familiar with the differences of the scholars of fiqh is not a faqih.”
Qatada said, “One who has not familiarity with the differences of the scholars has never smelled [the fragrance] of fiqh.”
‘Ala said, “It is not acceptable for one to give legal verdicts until he is well versed with the differences of the scholars.”
Giving the Easier Opinion
al-Zarkhashi wrote in al-Bahr al-Muhit:
“Taking the easier opinion could be related to different fiqh schools madhahib or to different possibilities [legal outcomes]. Those who follow this opinion base it on [the verses] ‘Allah wants ease for you.’ and ‘He placed no hardship in the faith.’ and [the hadith] ‘I was sent with the religion of ease and compassion.’ After discussing the different opinions surrounding this al-Zarkhashi wrote that the goal is to remove hardship and harm thus the opinion based on ease is correct.” al-bahr al-muhit 4/34
al-Mizi wrote: “Fom the principles of the law is that one guides others with what is easier when there is a difference between the two.”
Shawkani wrote: “Taking the difficult opinion is not something determined. On the contrary, taking the easier opinion [is what agrees] with the objectives of Shariah.”
The leeway afforded to scholars in choosing the easier opinion [when based on the correct methods] when presented with a host of possibilities is one of the outcomes related to the principle of “ease”. it affords the jurist the right to address the difficulties of his community and provide them with a healthy religious expression within the confines of their societies.
Part 3: What is the difference between ease and negligence?
This series of articles is amazing! I had a question(s) though:
If a layman is following a particular school of thought, is he allowed to take the rulings of a different school of thought if that makes matters easier for him? If that is true, where should the line be drawn, or does it even need to be drawn? Can a person nit-pick the easier opinions from different schools of thoughts and live accordingly?
on a different note, a wonderful conference is currently underway in Madras(chennai)INDIA with speakers like Yasir Qadhi, Bilal Philips,Abdur Rahim Green and others participating in it.You can follow the live streaming on
Great talks on Aqida, Dawah and contemporary issues facing the ummah.
Believe me, the conference is very well organised and a pleasure to attend.